Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/10080
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDhiman, Amit
dc.contributor.authorSingh, Manjari
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-29T05:27:27Z
dc.date.available2010-10-29T05:27:27Z
dc.date.copyright2007
dc.date.issued2007-10-29T05:27:27Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/10080
dc.descriptionVikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, Vol. 32, No. 1, (January-March, 2007), pp. 75-87en
dc.description.abstractPolitics is a bane of administrative systems such as performance appraisals. It not only debilitates the system’s credibility in the eyes of various stakeholders, but also adversely affects the employees’ morale and the organizational effectiveness. While admitting that rooting it out completely is impossible, it is in the organizational interest that it is mitigated to a large extent. In case of performance appraisals, assessees and assessors, both try to influence the assessees’ performance rating to advance self-interests.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectAppraisal Politicsen
dc.subjectAssessors and Assessesen
dc.subjectAmbiguityen
dc.titleAppraisal politics: revisiting from assessor's perspectiveen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Appraisalpolitics.pdf
  Restricted Access
173.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.