Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/10453
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKaul, Asha
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-03T06:02:58Z
dc.date.available2009-05-03T06:02:58Z
dc.date.copyright2009-10-15
dc.date.issued2009-05-03T06:02:58Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/10453
dc.descriptionVikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 34, 4 (October – December 2009), 79-83.en
dc.description.abstractMen are dominant, women are subservient;” “Men are aggressive, women are passive;” “Men are agentic, women are communal;” “Men are power-centric, women are person-centric;” “Men are single-focused, women are multi-focused;” “Men are bread winners, women are home makers.” The list of differences identified by researchers is seamless. Similarities have, rarely if ever, been recorded or found their space in research journals. Questions that readily come to the mind are: Does biological difference transcend all boundaries and get reflected in attitudes and behaviours clubbed under binary heads as “male” and “female?” Or is it that when the “difference” hypothesis yields null results, interest in the research topic wanes?
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleGender and workplace experienceen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
GenderandWorkplaceExperience_2009.pdf
  Restricted Access
421.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.