Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/10453
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kaul, Asha | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-05-03T06:02:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2009-05-03T06:02:58Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2009-10-15 | |
dc.date.issued | 2009-05-03T06:02:58Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/10453 | |
dc.description | Vikalpa: The Journal for Decision Makers, 34, 4 (October – December 2009), 79-83. | en |
dc.description.abstract | Men are dominant, women are subservient;” “Men are aggressive, women are passive;” “Men are agentic, women are communal;” “Men are power-centric, women are person-centric;” “Men are single-focused, women are multi-focused;” “Men are bread winners, women are home makers.” The list of differences identified by researchers is seamless. Similarities have, rarely if ever, been recorded or found their space in research journals. Questions that readily come to the mind are: Does biological difference transcend all boundaries and get reflected in attitudes and behaviours clubbed under binary heads as “male” and “female?” Or is it that when the “difference” hypothesis yields null results, interest in the research topic wanes? | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.title | Gender and workplace experience | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
GenderandWorkplaceExperience_2009.pdf Restricted Access | 421.08 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.