Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/10475
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRam Mohan, T. T.
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-04T04:41:34Z
dc.date.available2011-05-04T04:41:34Z
dc.date.copyright2010-01-16
dc.date.issued2010-01-16T04:41:34Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/10475
dc.descriptionEconomic and Political Weekly, 45, 3 (January 16-22, 2010), 8-10.en
dc.description.abstractThere have been a number of commissions and committees on the financial crisis over the past year, which have largely covered the same ground in their analysis and recommendations for reform of the financial sector. The Warwick Commission on International Financial Reform, constituted by the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom, however, strikes out on a different path. It raises a number of issues in a way that many other reports have not. And it also differs sharply in some of the recommendations it makes. This article highlights four themes that figure in the report: macroprudential regulation, rightsizing the financial sector, regulatory capture and home country versus host country regulation.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titlePost-crisis regulation: a contrarian perspectiveveen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
PostCrisis_Regulation_A_Contrarian_Perspective.pdf
  Restricted Access
1.67 MBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.