Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/11428
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJacob, Joshy-
dc.contributor.authorAgarwalla, Sobhesh Kumar-
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-25T11:46:44Z-
dc.date.available2013-11-25T11:46:44Z-
dc.date.copyright2012-12-
dc.date.issued2013-11-25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/11428-
dc.description.abstractThe paper examines the market impact of a unique IPO certi cation recently introduced in India mandatory grading of IPOs by a credit rating agency. The grading was expected to improve the IPO pricing e ciency by providing comprehensive issue-related information to the market, especially to the retail investors. The results indicate that grading has only a limited in uence on the IPO demand of retail and institutional investors. The low grade issues appear to have weaker demand from investors relative to the ungraded IPOs. But there is no evidence to support IPO pricing improvement due to the introduction of IPO grading. This is contrary to the evidence reported by some earlier studies. This suggests the failure of grading as an IPO certi cation.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries;W.P. No. 2012-12-07-
dc.subjectIPO underpricingen_US
dc.subjectIPO gradingen_US
dc.subjectIPO certi cationen_US
dc.subjectEmerging Marketsen_US
dc.titleMandatory IPO Grading: Does It Help Pricing E ciency?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2012-12-07sobhesh.pdfMandatory IPO Grading: Does It Help Pricing Eciency?500.86 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.