Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/11455
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAgarwal, Anurag K.
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-26T11:13:27Z
dc.date.available2013-11-26T11:13:27Z
dc.date.copyright2013-10
dc.date.issued2013-11-26
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/11455
dc.description.abstractOne of the foremost requirements of corporate governance is transparency in the system, which ensures that individuals making decisions for and on behalf of a company do so in the best interest of the company and clearly avoid conflict of interest. It is the crux of fiduciary duty – the duty of loyalty and care towards the employer – that personal interest is sacrificed as compared to the employer’s interest. Being on the right side of law is the goal but the line between legal and illegal is often hazy and changeable making it difficult for the practitioner to take any action and also for the judge to decide whether the line was breached or not. The paper deals with certain recent cases decided by higher courts in India and abroad on this issue.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries;W.P. No. 2013-10-05
dc.subjectCorporate Governanceen_US
dc.subjectFiduciary Dutyen_US
dc.subjectCareen_US
dc.subjectLoyaltyen_US
dc.subjectInterpretationen_US
dc.subjectConflict of Interesten_US
dc.titleCorporate governance: changing trends in interpreting fiduciary dutyen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2013-10-05Anurag Agarwal.pdfCorporate Governance: Changing Trends in Interpreting Fiduciary Duty449.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.