Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1247
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Srinivasan, G. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-03-14T11:56:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-03-14T11:56:41Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 1981-09 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-03-14T11:56:41Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1247 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Financial Institutions in India use IRR as a criterion for project evaluation. However they do not include the capital subsidy under the backward area development scheme in the computation of IRR. This note brings out the fact that if the subsidy is included in the IRR computation it will be non neutral. The bias will be infavour of projects which have longer initial flows. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | WP;1981/378 | - |
dc.subject | Project Evaluation | en |
dc.subject | capital subsidy | - |
dc.title | A note on non neutrality of capital subsidy under IRR criterion | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
Appears in Collections: | Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WP 1981_378.pdf | 82.85 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.