Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1327
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGupta, Anil K.-
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-15T11:51:00Z-
dc.date.available2010-03-15T11:51:00Z-
dc.date.copyright1990-09-
dc.date.issued2010-03-15T11:51:00Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/1327-
dc.description.abstractThere is a considerable concern in India about the 'silence' of a large number of disadvantaged groups who have either learned to be helpless or articulate their problems rather feebly. The nature of articulation, mediating structures or platforms for dialogue or negotiation be it political channels or voluntary arenas have to analysed as a basis of alienation of masses from the state. Emergence of the social movements encompassing ecological struggles particularly in backward regions indicates the limits of the patience of the poor disadvantaged people. One can hypothesize that NGOs emerged or became stronger when the political channels got partly choked so that people could neither remodel the nature of their representation nor communicate with/through state bureaucracy. The transition in mediating structures has been studies through five metaphors i.e. from counter to corridor; corridor to courts; courts to 'Chaurahas' (cross roads); 'Chaurahas' to Char diwaris' (four walls) and finally from 'Char diwaris to 'Chaupal' as a future solution.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;1990/894-
dc.subjectVoluntarismen
dc.subjectPoliticsen
dc.titlePolitics of articulation mediating structures and voluntarism: from 'chauraha' to 'chaupal'en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP 1990_894.pdf3.82 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.