Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/13336
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMukherjee, Sumitava
dc.contributor.authorSahay, Arvind
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-23T05:59:07Z
dc.date.available2015-04-23T05:59:07Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/13336
dc.description.abstractProsocial bonuses are incentive schemes where people get bonus money to spend on social causes or colleagues that can potentially improve functioning and satisfaction. It is not yet clear how people would evaluate and choose when simultaneously pro-self and prosocial options are posed. We presented three alternatives simultaneously for a bonus that could be spent on oneself or colleagues or poor people. Two studies measured predicted satisfaction for these alternative ways of spending the bonus and a third study examined whether people would indeed opt to spend a real monetary bonus prosocially when a pro-self option is available. Results provided converging evidences in support of prosocial bonuses if it is spent on poor people but not on colleagues.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management, Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;2394
dc.subjectProsocial bonusesen_US
dc.subjectSimultaneous evaluationen_US
dc.subjectbonus schemeen_US
dc.titleSimultaneous evaluation of pro-self and prosocial bonus schemes: implications for newer management policies towards social bettermenten_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP002394.pdfWP002394597.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.