Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1360
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBhatnagar, Deepti-
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-19T11:15:11Z-
dc.date.available2010-03-19T11:15:11Z-
dc.date.copyright1987-08-
dc.date.issued2010-03-19T11:15:11Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/1360-
dc.description.abstractPresent study was undertaken to find out whether different influence tactics are evaluated the same way, or differently, in downward and upward exercise of influence; whether appropriateness and effectiveness constitute two different dimensions of evaluation; and whether the sex of the influence agent and the influence target affects the evaluation of inlfuence tactics. Data were collected from 144 bank managers. Results shows that for influencing subordinates, manymore tactics are seen as being highly appropriate and effective, than for influencing superiors. Appropriateness and effectiveness emerged as two different dimensions of evaluation. The sex of the influence agent had no effect on the evaluation of influence tactics; however, the sex of the influence target affected the evaluation of the appropriateness of different influence tactics. Implications of these findings are presented.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;1987/695-
dc.subjectmanagerial influenceen
dc.titleEvaluation of managerial influence tacticsen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP 1987_695.pdf766.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.