Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1362
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRaghunathan, V.-
dc.contributor.authorSrinivasan, G.-
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-19T11:16:58Z-
dc.date.available2010-03-19T11:16:58Z-
dc.date.copyright1987-01-
dc.date.issued2010-03-19T11:16:58Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/1362-
dc.description.abstractThere is considerable literature in the field of finance concerning the valuation of negative cash flows. Consequently, it is widely held that a project should be valued by valuing each component of the project's cash inflows and outflows separately, either by discounting the cash flowing at appropriate RADRs or by using the certainty equivalent approach. This paper discusses the implicit inadequacies in using the above approach for project evaluation and recommends valuing the Net Cash Flow of the project either by using a single RADR or using the certainty equivalent framework.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;1987/653-
dc.subjectValuationen
dc.subjectCash Flowsen
dc.titleProject is a compound - not a mixture conceptual problems in valuationen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP 1987_653.pdf279.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.