Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/13749
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dixit, Mukund R. | |
dc.contributor.author | Karthik, D. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-29T11:32:48Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-29T11:32:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/13749 | |
dc.description.abstract | This exercise describes the competitive dynamics situation faced by two large companies, Colgate – Palmolive and Proctor and Gamble in oral care business. Both of them introduced a tooth whitening solutions and anticipated to sustain their competitive lead. P&G introduced its solution in August 2000 and Colgate followed it in September 2002. This was followed by another introduction by Colgate April 2003. The intensified the competitive battle between the two companies. The participants are required to get into the shoes of either Colgate or P&G to think through a competitive strategy. The case provides information on the estimated demand for tooth whitening solutions, gains and losses of the two companies, R&D expenditure, players in the oral hygiene market and legal framework for complaining to facilitate the analysis of the situation and decision making by the participants. The case can be used in modules on competitive strategy, innovation, and economics of strategy. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad | en_US |
dc.subject | Market Share | en_US |
dc.subject | Innovation | en_US |
dc.subject | Competition | en_US |
dc.subject | Retaliation | en_US |
dc.title | Proctor & Gamble v/s Colgate - 2003: An Exercise in Competitive Dynamics | en_US |
dc.type | Cases and Notes | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Cases and Notes |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.