Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1582
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dholakia, Ravindra H. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-03-24T09:08:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-03-24T09:08:20Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 1987-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-03-24T09:08:20Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1582 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Male-female wage differential in the Indian economy can be explained satisfactorily by the model of wage discriminating monopsony provided that the wage elasticities of supply of male and female labour are significantly different. In the present paper individual labour supply functions are derived by optimizing the family utility function. The correspoding elasticity functions are then examined for their implications. It is hown that infinite elasticity of laboursupply implies unrealistic assumptions about the marginal utilities of money income and leisure. It is also argued that under the prevalent family system in India, the wage elasticity of labour supply for males is likely to be higher than the one for females. The observed phenomenon of female workers being paid a lower wage rate than male workers of equal skill, qualificaiton and experience can, therefore, be explained by the model of wage discriminating monopsony inthe labour market. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | WP;1987/715 | - |
dc.subject | Labor supply | en |
dc.subject | Wage | en |
dc.subject | Elasticity | en |
dc.title | Wage elasticity of labour supply for males and females | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
Appears in Collections: | Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WP 1987_715.pdf | 388.3 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.