Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1594
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRastogi, A. B.
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-24T09:41:16Z
dc.date.available2010-03-24T09:41:16Z
dc.date.copyright1992-05
dc.date.issued2010-03-24T09:41:16Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/1594
dc.description.abstractIn 1979, when the Conservative party was elected in the UK, it was no more than a gut feeling, impatience and inability to improve the working of the nationalised industries, it was felt that the invisible hand of the market may hold the key to success of these industries. Nevertheless, on surface it was projected by the Party and the government that the present value of aggregate net benefits to UK consumers would be higher when the state owned companies would be under private management. In India, the debate about improving the performance of PSUs started as early as late seventies as PSUs were not generating enough resources and as a whole were a drain on the public ex-chequer. The main issues in this debate, in India, are private vs public ownership, valuation of public enterprise shares and exit policy for labour and enterprises. A successful privatisation programme shall not only unshackle the economy but also give more time to politicians to concentrate on managing the economy rather than meddling in day to day affairs of business enterprises.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;1992/1031
dc.subjectPrivatisationen
dc.titlePrivatisation programme in Britain and East European countries: some lessons for Indiaen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP 1992_1031.pdf1.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.