Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1601
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPestonjee, D. M.
dc.date.accessioned2010-03-24T09:49:39Z
dc.date.available2010-03-24T09:49:39Z
dc.date.copyright1988-05
dc.date.issued2010-03-24T09:49:39Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/1601
dc.description.abstractIn the present study, attempt is made to explore the types of role stresses experienced by top and middle management personnel and to establish the degree of relationship among these role stress variables. 'ORS Scale' developed and standardized by Pareek (1983) was administered on a sample of 221 top managers and 326 middle managers. This scale measures ten types of role stresses as well as overall role stress. Critical ratio test, median test and Pearson's product moment coefficients of correlation were used to analyse the data. Findings of the study revealed that Middle managers (MMG) scored significantly higher on interrole distance, personal inadequacy, self-role distance and resource inadequacy. Role expectation conflict, role ambiguity and overall role stress were also found to be significantly higher in case of middle managers (MMG) as compared to top managers (TMG). Out of 55 coefficients of correlation among role stress factors, 53 for top managers and 51 for middle managers emerged as statistically significant. In the light of findings, implications of the study are also discussed.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;1988/749
dc.subjectMiddle managementen
dc.subjectTop Managementen
dc.subjectStressen
dc.titleStudy of role stresses in top and middle managementen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP 1988_749.pdf526.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.