Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/17362
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Dheeraj
dc.contributor.authorVarsha, Verma
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-12T04:37:33Z
dc.date.available2016-01-12T04:37:33Z
dc.date.copyright2014
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationVerma, Varsha and Sharma, Dheeraj (2014). Case Study: Lance Armstrong and Livestrong Foundation: Rising Again after the Fall. Business Cases Ivey Publishing.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/17362
dc.description.abstractLance Armstrong, a world-famous cyclist, was charged with using performance-enhancing drugs (i.e. “doping”). Armstrong had vehemently denied similar charges a few years earlier; however, this time there was substantial proof available and Armstrong accepted the charges. Subsequent to this news, most of the brands that had endorsed Armstrong terminated their contracts with him. As a cancer survivor, Armstrong had started Livestrong Foundation, an organization to support cancer patients, caregivers and survivors. This foundation depended heavily on sponsorships received by Armstrong. To protect his foundation from the negative impact of the doping controversy, Armstrong immediately resigned from both his post as chairman of Livestrong and from its board of directors. Despite his efforts, Livestrong was losing its sponsorships and a solution was needed to reduce the negative publicity, stop the loss of funding and identify new sources of funding.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIvey Publishingen_US
dc.subjectLance Armstrong and Livestrong Foundationen_US
dc.subjectcyclisten_US
dc.titleLance Armstrong and Livestrong foundation: rising again after the fallen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.