Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1791
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dholakia, Bakul H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Dholakia, Ravindra H. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-03-29T09:04:27Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-03-29T09:04:27Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 1994-09 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-03-29T09:04:27Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/1791 | - |
dc.description.abstract | It is a widely held hypothesis that the Indian industry experienced a significant turnaround in its Total Factor Productivity Growth (TEPG) during the decade of the eighties as compared to the seventies. Recently it is argued that if the real value added is estimated by using the double deflation method, this hypothesis does not hold. It is also suggested that the double deflation method provides a more appropriate measure of the real value added. In the present paper, it is shown that the hypothesis of a significant increase in TFPG during the eighties in the Indian industries is clearly corroborated if sufficient care is taken about applying the double deflation method. Moreover, it is also argued that the double deflation method per se is not necessarily superior to the single deflation method for measuring the real value added. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | WP;1994/1210 | - |
dc.subject | Manufacturing Industries-India | en |
dc.title | Appropriate measure of real value added and total factor productivity growth in Indian Manufacturing | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
Appears in Collections: | Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WP 1994_1210.pdf | 755 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.