Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/19062
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Pandey, Ajay | |
dc.contributor.author | R., Arvind Saran | |
dc.contributor.author | Kumar, Amit | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-03-09T10:50:49Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-03-09T10:50:49Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2004 | |
dc.date.issued | 2004 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/19062 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper provides a comparison between the CDS spreads estimated by Hull and white model and Equivalent Recovery model. The paper compares the models for different maturities, using different time-varying hazard rate functions for estimation of default probability density function. It also uses the two models to compare the CED spreads for bonds with different credit ratings. The paper discusses other alternative ways of modeling CDS spreads. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | SP;001055 | |
dc.subject | Equivalent Recovery model | en_US |
dc.subject | Hull and white model | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of CDS prices for different valuation models and hazard rates | en_US |
dc.type | Student Project | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Student Projects |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
SP_2004_1055.pdf Restricted Access | 926.92 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.