Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/19396
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShukla, P. R.
dc.contributor.authorHourcade, Jean-Charles
dc.contributor.authorCassen, C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-21T05:50:11Z
dc.date.available2017-06-21T05:50:11Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationHourcade J.-C., Shukla P.-R., Cassen C. (2015). Climate policy architecture for the Cancun paradigm shift: building on the lessons from history. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 15(4), 353-367.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/19396
dc.description.abstractThe economics of climate policy after Rio led to a climate centric paradigm which departs from the original UNFCCC’s cooperative framework for designing climate policies from the perspective of sustainable development. This resulted in a cap-and-trade approach which aims to mitigate the adverse effects on development through appropriate transfers to achieve fair burden sharing. However, the continuation of this paradigm cannot untie the development-climate Gordian knot. (The Gordian Knot refers to a seemingly intractable problem. According to a Greek legend, Gordios arrived in Phrygia in an ox cart, was made King and dedicated his cart to Zeus, tying it up with an intricate knot. The person who would untie the knot would rule Asia. Alexander the Great found a solution by cutting it with his sword. Hourcade et al. (The design of climate policy. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 408, 2008) explain that, after Rio Earth Summit (1992), the climate negotiations remained disengaged from the debates on development pathways, thus tying up a new Gordian knot of misunderstandings.) Instead one loses sight of the benefits of cooperation in a global agreement to abate GHGs emissions. The challenge is now to align the development and climate objectives taking into consideration the changing context since the 1990s which includes a re-equilibrium of the world economic balance and the adverse context created by the 2008 financial crisis. This paper proposes that carbon finance should be considered as part of a general reform of the financial system. The adoption of a carbon value as a notional price could trigger a wave of low-carbon investments in the world thereby redirecting some global savings towards low-carbon investments, thus providing a lever for equitable access to development.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlandsen_US
dc.subjectCarbon assetsen_US
dc.subjectClimate regimeen_US
dc.subjectEquityen_US
dc.subjectFinanceen_US
dc.subjectPolicy instrumentsen_US
dc.subjectSocial cost of carbonen_US
dc.titleClimate policy architecture for the Cancun paradigm shift: building on the lessons from historyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Climate policy architecture_Int_Environment_Agreements_Hourcade_2015.pdf
  Restricted Access
410.58 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.