Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/20252
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSharma, Dheeraj-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-06T11:19:43Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-06T11:19:43Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-04-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/20252-
dc.description.abstractIn pursuance of determining the scientific status of marketing, this article first determines what constitutes science. Thereafter, the article conducts a formal analysis of various schools of thought of science. Specifically, the article offers a comparison between historical relativism, scientific realism, logical empiricism, and logical positivism. Furthermore, in view of analysis, this article examines if marketing qualifies to be a science. Finally, the article attempts to offer a resolution to the ongoing debate on scientific status of marketing by proposing resource advantage theory as a general theory of marketing.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesW.P.;2016-03-30-
dc.subjecthistorical relativismen_US
dc.subjectscientific realismen_US
dc.subjectlogical empiricismen_US
dc.subjectlogical positivismen_US
dc.subjectMarketing a Scienceen_US
dc.titleIs marketing a science: Debate revisiteden_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP_2016_03_30.pdfWP_2016_3_30304.01 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.