Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/20268
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGhosh, Diptesh
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-07T05:14:56Z
dc.date.available2018-02-07T05:14:56Z
dc.date.issued2016-03-18
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/20268
dc.description.abstractThe tool indexing problem is one of allocating tools to slots in a tool magazine so as to minimize the tool change time in automated machining. Genetic algorithms have been suggested in the literature to solve this problem, but the reasons behind the choice of operators for those algorithms are unclear. In this paper we compare the performances of four common crossover operators and four common mutation operators to find the one most suited for the problem. Our experiments show that the choice of operators for the genetic algorithms presented in the literature is suboptimal.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesW.P.;2016-03-29
dc.subjectGenetic algorithmen_US
dc.subjectPermutation problemen_US
dc.subjectCrossoveren_US
dc.subjectMutationen_US
dc.titleComparing genetic algorithm crossover and mutation operators for the indexing problemen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP_2016_03_29.pdfWP_2016_3_29291.74 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.