Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/20271
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Tripathi, Sanjeev | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-02-07T05:39:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2018-02-07T05:39:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-03-14 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/20271 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We examine the behavior of players when they play with their own vs. other people’s money; we investigate this for both dictator and ultimatum games. The results suggest that the behavior of the players differs when they play with their own money as compared to other people’s money. In a dictator game, the offer sizes are larger when playing for others, as people seem to offer more when they do not bear the cost. However, in ultimatum games, proposers tend to be more strategic, less risk averse and make lower offers, when they play with other people’s money than with their own money. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | W.P.;2016-03-16 | - |
dc.subject | Dictator game | en_US |
dc.subject | Ultimatum game | en_US |
dc.subject | Other people’s money | en_US |
dc.title | Why should i care - Its others money | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WP_2016_03_16.pdf | WP_2016_3_16 | 616.55 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.