Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/20271
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTripathi, Sanjeev-
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-07T05:39:24Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-07T05:39:24Z-
dc.date.issued2016-03-14-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/20271-
dc.description.abstractWe examine the behavior of players when they play with their own vs. other people’s money; we investigate this for both dictator and ultimatum games. The results suggest that the behavior of the players differs when they play with their own money as compared to other people’s money. In a dictator game, the offer sizes are larger when playing for others, as people seem to offer more when they do not bear the cost. However, in ultimatum games, proposers tend to be more strategic, less risk averse and make lower offers, when they play with other people’s money than with their own money.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesW.P.;2016-03-16-
dc.subjectDictator gameen_US
dc.subjectUltimatum gameen_US
dc.subjectOther people’s moneyen_US
dc.titleWhy should i care - Its others moneyen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP_2016_03_16.pdfWP_2016_3_16616.55 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.