Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/20485
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Gupta, Anil K. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-03-07T04:27:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-03-07T04:27:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1998-12-01 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/20485 | |
dc.description.abstract | Extraction of local knowledge of people has gone on for a very long time without any reciprocity or accountability towards the knowledge providers. The paper looks at several kinds of accountability of researchers such as towards (a) providers, the communities, individuals and professional; (b) professional bodies, and (c) one s own conscience. Various forms of natural and non-natural rewards for individual and collective research are discussed next. Finally, the issue of accountability towards future generation which does not vote in the present day decision making is discussed. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | WP;1493 | |
dc.subject | Indigenous knowledge | en_US |
dc.title | Ethics of extraction: Biodiversity and indigenous knowledge | en_US |
dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WP 1998_1493.pdf | WP_1998_1493 | 1.08 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.