Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/20503
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKandathil, George
dc.contributor.authorJoseph, Jerome
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-10T13:59:26Z
dc.date.available2018-03-10T13:59:26Z
dc.date.issued2017-09-21
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/20503
dc.description.abstractThis paper seeks to join studies which have drawn attention to the ethical reflexivity of research and the research enterprise in the organisational studies’ field. Towards this end, we review OB, HRM, and IR studies on direct employee participation in organisations post-1990s to examine their normative underpinnings. Using Fox’s (Industrial sociology and industrial relations. Research Paper 3, Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employers’ Associations, HMSO, London, 1966, Beyond contract: Work, power and trust relations. Faber and Faber, London, 1974) three frames—unitarist, pluralist, and radical—we compare the underpinnings within and across the chosen disciplines to bring ethical reflexivity to studies in this area of inquiry. Implications are drawn out to take forward the quest for more ethically reflexive employee participation research.en_US
dc.publisherSpringer Internationalen_US
dc.subjectDirect participation, Ethically reflexive research, Frame of reference, Multidisciplinary review, Normative underpinningsen_US
dc.titleNormative underpinnings of direct employee participation studies and implications for developing ethical reflexivity: a multidisciplinary reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Normative.pdf
  Restricted Access
471.43 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.