Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/2050
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAgarwal, Anurag K.
dc.date.accessioned2010-04-08T10:26:44Z
dc.date.available2010-04-08T10:26:44Z
dc.date.copyright2008
dc.date.issued2010-04-08T10:26:44Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/2050
dc.descriptionCompleteden
dc.description.abstractDespite arbitration being the chosen method of dispute resolution in businesses, it is often seen that the matters somehow reach the court and then they are lost in the maze of procedure and legal technicalities. The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, defines court as the principal civil court of original jurisdiction. In all the districts, this means that it is the court of the district judge and district judge only. The district judge cannot even delegate the matters to additional district judges. As the district judge is responsible for a number of other matters including criminal matters (the district and sessions judge positions are often combined in one), he hardly has time to dispose of matters of arbitration. Owing to paucity of time, matters are adjourned several times which increases the time of resolution of business disputes.en
dc.description.sponsorshipIndian Institute of Management, Ahmedabaden
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectBusiness Policyen
dc.titleArbitration: Principal Civil Court of Original Jurisdictionen
dc.typeResearch Projecten
Appears in Collections:Research Projects

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.