Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/21901
Title: | Theory of open inclusive innovation for reciprocal, responsive and respectful outcomes: coping creatively with climatic and institutional risks |
Other Titles: | Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity |
Authors: | Gupta, Anil K. Dey, Anamika R. Shinde, Chintan Mahanta, Hiranmay Patel, Chetan Patel, Ramesh Sahay, Nirmal Sahu, Balram Vivekanandan, P. Verma, Sundaram Ganesham, P. Kumar, Vivek Kumar, Vipin Patel, Mahesh Tole, Pooja |
Keywords: | Open Innovation Theory;Honey Bee Network;Marketing |
Issue Date: | 2016 |
Publisher: | MDPI |
Citation: | Gupta, A.K., & Dey, A., Shinde, C. et al (2016). Theory of open inclusive innovation for reciprocal, responsive and respectful outcomes : Coping creatively with climatic and institutional risks. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 2, (1). DOI 10.1186/ s40852-016-0038-8 |
Abstract: | Given the economic squeeze world over, search for what we call frugal grassroots innovations in Honey Bee Network, has become even more urgent and relevant in the recent years. And, to shape this search, models and concepts like open innovation, reverse innovation (GE, Market-Relevant Design: Making ECGs Available Across India, 2009); (Govindarajan, Reverse Innovation: a Playbook, 2012); (Govindarajan and Ramamurti. Global Strategy Journal, 1: 191–205, 2011); (Govindarajan and Euchner, Res. Technol. Manage, 55: 13–17, 2012, Govindrajan and Trimble, 40(5), 5–11, 2012), embedded innovation (Simanis and Hart, Innovation from the Inside Out, MIT Sloan Management Review, 2009), extremely affordable, low-cost, frugal innovation (Honey Bee Network, 1989–2016, Gupta, 2000); (Gupta AK, How Local Knowledge can Boost Scientific Studies, 2007); (Gupta AK, Indian Hidden hotebd of invention, 2009a; Gupta AK, http://anilg.sristi.org/harnessing-stimulus-forpromoting-innovations-and-entrepreneurship/, 2009b) etc., have emerged over time. We wish to trace the evolution of the Open Innovation Theory (Urban and Von Hippel, Manag. Sci. 34(5), 569–582, 1988) in the context of the Honey Bee Network working on such ideas for over 26 years. The idea is to study the different strands of relationships between knowledge providers and seekers which make the system truly reciprocal, responsible and responsive. When systems become open, search cost for inclusive innovation will automatically come down and the knowledge system will also become more symmetrical and inclusive. Inclusive innovation for social development implies that new solutions should help in dealing with one or more of the five factors of exclusion: spatial, seasonal, sectoral, skill and social. These should also be accessible, affordable, available and adaptable to varying and differentiated user endowments and needs, besides being circular. One has to understand the interaction between natural, social, ethical and intellectual capital, situated in the institutional context of innovations: at, from, for and with grassroots level communities for defining inclusivity in the innovation ecosystem. |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/21901 |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Theory of open inclusive innovation_2016.pdf Restricted Access | Theory of open inclusive innovation_2016 | 515.02 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.