Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/21913
Title: Does multiple borrowing necessarily mean over-borrowing?
Other Titles: Enterprise Development and Microfinance
Authors: LAHKAR, RATUL
Pingali, Viswanath
SADHU, SANTADARSHAN
Keywords: microfinance;over-indebtedness;multiple borrowing;joint liability
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Practical Action Publishing
Citation: Lahkar, R., Pingali, V., & Sadhu, S. (2016). Does multiple borrowing necessarily mean overborrowing. Enterprise Development Microfinance: An International Journal Of Microfinance and Business Development, 27, (2), 132-141. DOI: 10.3362/l755- 1986.2016.009
Abstract: Using a survey dataset collected from Andhra Pradesh, India, we test if multiple borrowing is equivalent to over-borrowing. Results suggest that over-borrowing and multiple loans are not necessarily synonymous. As the number of credit agencies in a village increases, the average loan burden of villagers does not increase. We also find evidence of substitution of formal sources of credit for informal ones with increased presence of formal credit institutions. Such substitution is greater with addition of microcredit institutions than with other formal lending agencies. Our results indicate that joint liability setup seems to ensure that individuals at a greater risk of non-repayment are discouraged from obtaining microcredit.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/21913
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Does multiple borrowing_2016.pdf
  Restricted Access
Does multiple borrowing_2016575.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.