Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22002
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ravichandran, N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Radha, R. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-01T01:25:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-01T01:25:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-10-24 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22002 | |
dc.description.abstract | A middle aged woman was advised hysterectomy based on the clinical symptoms presented by her. Hysterectomy was advised by an Oncology Gynecology surgeon. An experienced Urological Consultant advised against hysterectomy. Ms. Tara was confused and hence through a common friend reached out to a Gynecologist for a second opinion. The experience turned out to be not so pleasant and inconclusive in terms of opinion. Upset and disappointed with the experience, the patient and her husband were contemplating possible legal action against the Consultant. The central issue in the case is to decide the worthwhile nature of such an initiative. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | QM0283; | |
dc.subject | Hysterectomy | en_US |
dc.subject | Medical Advise | en_US |
dc.title | A Patient's Dilemma : To Litigate or Otherwise | en_US |
dc.type | Cases and Notes | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Cases and Notes |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.