Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22042
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPathak, Akhileshwar-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-03T02:39:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-03T02:39:48Z-
dc.date.issued2019-02-21-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/22042-
dc.description.abstractTitle retention clause was introduced in sale of goods contracts to prevent the transfer of ownership till the seller was fully paid. Exigencies of businesses have led to introduction of further clauses allowing the buyer to use or sub-sell the goods even before the transfer of ownership. The conflicting provisions as the judgement of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in PST Energy 7 Shipping v.O.W. Bunkjer Malta Limited brings out, changes the very character of the contract. The contract fails to be a contract of sale of goods depriving the parties of the valuable rights.en_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBP0429;-
dc.subjectSale Contractsen_US
dc.subjectTransfer of Ownershipen_US
dc.subjectContract Termsen_US
dc.titleOwnership Retention Terms in Sale Contracts Gone Astray: PST Energy 7 Shipping v.O.w. Bunker Malta Limiteden_US
dc.typeCases and Notesen_US
Appears in Collections:Cases and Notes

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.