Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22042
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pathak, Akhileshwar | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-03T02:39:48Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-03T02:39:48Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-02-21 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22042 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Title retention clause was introduced in sale of goods contracts to prevent the transfer of ownership till the seller was fully paid. Exigencies of businesses have led to introduction of further clauses allowing the buyer to use or sub-sell the goods even before the transfer of ownership. The conflicting provisions as the judgement of the United Kingdom Supreme Court in PST Energy 7 Shipping v.O.W. Bunkjer Malta Limited brings out, changes the very character of the contract. The contract fails to be a contract of sale of goods depriving the parties of the valuable rights. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | BP0429; | - |
dc.subject | Sale Contracts | en_US |
dc.subject | Transfer of Ownership | en_US |
dc.subject | Contract Terms | en_US |
dc.title | Ownership Retention Terms in Sale Contracts Gone Astray: PST Energy 7 Shipping v.O.w. Bunker Malta Limited | en_US |
dc.type | Cases and Notes | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Cases and Notes |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.