Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22065
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPathak, Akhileshwar-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-03T20:32:36Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-03T20:32:36Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03-29-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/22065-
dc.description.abstractMost business contracts are meant to be in writing, on standard terms. However, with the facilities of communications, businesspersons will talk business on the phone. With this, contentions will arise, whether they were only negotiating or had gone the distance and made a contract. If they have contracted, what are the terms of the contract? The case explores the judgement of the United Kingdom Supreme Court judgement, Wells v Devani, which is on the theme of oral contracts.en_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBP0435;-
dc.subjectFormation of Contractsen_US
dc.subjectConsiderationen_US
dc.subjectImplied Termsen_US
dc.titleOral Agreements, Implied Terms and the Context: Wells v Devanien_US
dc.typeCases and Notesen_US
Appears in Collections:Cases and Notes

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.