Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22237
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pathak, Akhileshwar | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-06T23:05:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-06T23:05:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2017-07-12 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22237 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Sale of real estate property requires registration of sale documents which prevents fraud of the same property being sold to multiple buyers. However, a means to avoid registration was devised and put to use in certain parts of North India. This involved creating a set of three documents - an unregistered sale deed, a Power of Attorney to the buyer from the seller and a will from the seller bequeathing the property to the buyer. The Delhi High Court considered this a ‘recognised mode of transaction.’ The Supreme Court, in the Suraj Lamp Case, brings out that unless a sale deed is registered, no interest can be created in a property. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | BP410; | - |
dc.subject | Power of Attorney Sale | en_US |
dc.subject | Sale of immovable property | en_US |
dc.title | The Suraj Lamp Case: Real Estate Markets | en_US |
dc.type | Cases and Notes | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Cases and Notes |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.