Corporate criminal liability in India

IIMA Institutional Repository

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22746

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.advisor
dc.contributor.author	Ram Mohan, M. P.
dc.date.accessioned	2020-01-13T09:08:31Z
dc.date.available	2020-01-13T09:08:31Z
dc.date.issued	2019-12-10
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11718/22746
dc.description.abstract	The cases of Standard Chartered v. Directorate of Enforcement (2005), Iridium India v. Motorola Inc & Ors. (2011), and Sunil Bharti Mittal v. Central Bureau of Investigation represent a significant development in India’s corporate criminal liability jurisprudence. Standard Chartered reconciled mandatory imprisonment (as prescribed for punishing many offences under Indian law) with the impossibility of imprisoning corporations, Iridium explained whether corporations are capable of committing crimes which require intent (mens rea), and Sunil Bharti Mittal clarified whether the liability of a corporation for a criminal act can be attributed to its directors/promoters.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.publisher	Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad	en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries	BP0438;
dc.subject	Corporate Governance	en_US
dc.subject	Corporate criminal liability	en_US
dc.subject	Alter Ego	en_US
dc.subject	Theory of Attribution	en_US
dc.subject	Business Law	en_US
dc.subject	Negligence and Liability	en_US
dc.title	Corporate criminal liability in India	en_US
dc.type	Cases and Notes	en_US
dcterms.publisher	Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad
Appears in Collections:	Cases and Notes

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.