Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/23471
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dholakia, Ravindra H. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-01-22T08:45:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-01-22T08:45:08Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-10-10 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/23471 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This comment points out an erroneous assumption in the calculations and central argument of Rajakumar and Shetty ("Gross Value Added: Why Not the Double Deflation Method for Estimation?," EPW, 15 August 2015) that reverses almost all their inferences and conclusions. If construction and service input prices are also considered in the construction of the input price deflators, the double deflation method may further raise the manufacturing real income rather than depressing it. Conditions under which single or double deflation can better approximate the Index of Industrial Production growth rate are also discussed. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Economic & Political Weekly | en_US |
dc.subject | Manufacturing sector | en_US |
dc.subject | Double deflation method | en_US |
dc.subject | Industrial production growth rate | en_US |
dc.subject | Growth of manufacturing sector | en_US |
dc.title | Double deflation method and growth of manufacturing: a comment | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Double_Deflation_Method_and_Growth_of_Manufacturing.pdf Restricted Access | Double deflation method and growth of manufacturing: a comment | 169.09 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.