Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/25189
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJohansson D.J.A.
dc.contributor.authorLucas P.L.
dc.contributor.authorWeitzel M.
dc.contributor.authorAhlgren E.O.
dc.contributor.authorBazaz A.B.
dc.contributor.authorChen W.
dc.contributor.authorden Elzen M.G.J.
dc.contributor.authorGhosh J.
dc.contributor.authorGrahn M.
dc.contributor.authorLiang Q.-M.
dc.contributor.authorPeterson S.
dc.contributor.authorPradhan B.K.
dc.contributor.authorvan Ruijven B.J.
dc.contributor.authorShukla P.R.
dc.contributor.authorvan Vuuren D.P.
dc.contributor.authorWei Y.-M.
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T10:13:49Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-11T10:13:49Z-
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationJohansson, D. J. A., Lucas, P. L., Weitzel, M., Ahlgren, E. O., Bazaz, A. B., Chen, W., den Elzen, M. G. J., Ghosh, J., Grahn, M., Liang, Q. M., Peterson, S., Pradhan, B. K., van Ruijven, B. J., Shukla, P. R., van Vuuren, D. P., & Wei, Y. M. (2015). Multi-model comparison of the economic and energy implications for China and India in an international climate regime. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 20(8). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9549-4
dc.identifier.issn13812386
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9549-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/25189-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents a modeling comparison on how stabilization of global climate change at about 2牥C above the pre-industrial level could affect economic and energy systems development in China and India. Seven General Equilibrium (CGE) and energy system models on either the global or national scale are soft-linked and harmonized with respect to population and economic assumptions. We simulate a climate regime, based on long-term convergence of per capita carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, starting from the emission pledges presented in the Copenhagen Accord to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and allowing full emissions trading between countries. Under the climate regime, Indian emission allowances are allowed to grow more than the Chinese allowances, due to the per capita convergence rule and the higher population growth in India. Economic and energy implications not only differ among the two countries, but also across model types. Decreased energy intensity is the most important abatement approach in the CGE models, while decreased carbon intensity is most important in the energy system models. The reduction in carbon intensity is mostly achieved through deployment of carbon capture and storage, renewable energy sources and nuclear energy. The economic impacts are generally higher in China than in India, due to higher 2010�50 cumulative abatement in China and the fact that India can offset more of its abatement cost though international emission trading. � 2014, The Author(s).
dc.description.sponsorshipSeventh Framework Programme,燜P7: 226282;燬ixth Framework Programme,燜P6
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherKluwer Academic Publishers
dc.relation.ispartofMitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
dc.subjectChina
dc.subjectClimate policy
dc.subjectCosts
dc.subjectEnergy
dc.subjectIndia
dc.titleMulti-model comparison of the economic and energy implications for China and India in an international climate regime
dc.typeArticle
dc.rights.licenseCC BY
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 412 96, Sweden
dc.contributor.affiliationPBL Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency, PO Box 303, Bilthoven, 3720 AH, Netherlands
dc.contributor.affiliationKiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiellinie 66, Kiel, 24105, Germany
dc.contributor.affiliationPublic Systems Group, Wing 3, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad, 380015, India
dc.contributor.affiliationEnergy, Environment, and Economy (3E) Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Economic Growth (IEG), University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India
dc.contributor.affiliationCenter for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China
dc.contributor.affiliationNational Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), PO Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80305, United States
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht, 3584 CS, Netherlands
dc.contributor.institutionauthorJohansson, D.J.A., Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 412 96, Sweden
dc.contributor.institutionauthorLucas, P.L., PBL Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency, PO Box 303, Bilthoven, 3720 AH, Netherlands
dc.contributor.institutionauthorWeitzel, M., Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiellinie 66, Kiel, 24105, Germany
dc.contributor.institutionauthorAhlgren, E.O., Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 412 96, Sweden
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBazaz, A.B., Public Systems Group, Wing 3, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad, 380015, India
dc.contributor.institutionauthorChen, W., Energy, Environment, and Economy (3E) Research Institute, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China
dc.contributor.institutionauthorden Elzen, M.G.J., PBL Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency, PO Box 303, Bilthoven, 3720 AH, Netherlands
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGhosh, J., Institute of Economic Growth (IEG), University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGrahn, M., Department of Energy and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, 412 96, Sweden
dc.contributor.institutionauthorLiang, Q.-M., Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China
dc.contributor.institutionauthorPeterson, S., Kiel Institute for the World Economy, Kiellinie 66, Kiel, 24105, Germany
dc.contributor.institutionauthorPradhan, B.K., Institute of Economic Growth (IEG), University of Delhi, North Campus, Delhi, 110007, India
dc.contributor.institutionauthorvan Ruijven, B.J., PBL Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency, PO Box 303, Bilthoven, 3720 AH, Netherlands, National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), PO Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80305, United States
dc.contributor.institutionauthorShukla, P.R., Public Systems Group, Wing 3, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Vastrapur, Ahmedabad, 380015, India
dc.contributor.institutionauthorvan Vuuren, D.P., PBL Netherlands Environment Assessment Agency, PO Box 303, Bilthoven, 3720 AH, Netherlands, Department of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, Utrecht, 3584 CS, Netherlands
dc.contributor.institutionauthorWei, Y.-M., Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 100081, China
dc.description.scopusid7003521825
dc.description.scopusid57189020337
dc.description.scopusid55009233500
dc.description.scopusid7004177316
dc.description.scopusid57188872375
dc.description.scopusid55808020800
dc.description.scopusid6602757925
dc.description.scopusid55622061800
dc.description.scopusid22934096200
dc.description.scopusid13002620600
dc.description.scopusid8950606500
dc.description.scopusid7006731628
dc.description.scopusid16025936300
dc.description.scopusid7202961290
dc.description.scopusid7003501910
dc.description.scopusid13005705700
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11027-014-9549-4
dc.identifier.endpage1359
dc.identifier.startpage1335
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.volume20
Appears in Collections:Open Access Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
multi model_comparison_of_2015.pdf803.72 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.