Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/25354
Title: | Looking under the hood: A comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models |
Authors: | Krey V. Guo F. Kolp P. Zhou W. Schaeffer R. Awasthy A. Bertram C. de Boer H.-S. Fragkos P. Fujimori S. He C. Iyer G. Keramidas K. K鯾erle A.C. Oshiro K. Reis L.A. Shoai-Tehrani B. Vishwanathan S. Capros P. Drouet L. Edmonds J.E. Garg A. Gernaat D.E.H.J. Jiang K. Kannavou M. Kitous A. Kriegler E. Luderer G. Mathur R. Muratori M. Sano F. van Vuuren D.P. |
Keywords: | Capital and O&M costs;Conversion efficiency;Integrated assessment models;Levelised cost of energy;Lifetime;Techno-economic assumptions |
Issue Date: | 2019 |
Publisher: | Elsevier Ltd |
Citation: | Krey, V., Guo, F., Kolp, P., Zhou, W., Schaeffer, R., Awasthy, A., Bertram, C., de Boer, H. S., Fragkos, P., Fujimori, S., He, C., Iyer, G., Keramidas, K., K鯾erle, A. C., Oshiro, K., Reis, L. A., Shoai-Tehrani, B., Vishwanathan, S., Capros, P., � van Vuuren, D. P. (2019). Looking under the hood: A comparison of techno-economic assumptions across national and global integrated assessment models. Energy, 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.131 |
Abstract: | Integrated assessment models are extensively used in the analysis of climate change mitigation and are informing national decision makers as well as contribute to international scientific assessments. This paper conducts a comprehensive review of techno-economic assumptions in the electricity sector among fifteen different global and national integrated assessment models. Particular focus is given to six major economies in the world: Brazil, China, the EU, India, Japan and the US. The comparison reveals that techno-economic characteristics are quite different across integrated assessment models, both for the base year and future years. It is, however, important to recognize that techno-economic assessments from the literature exhibit an equally large range of parameters as the integrated assessment models reviewed. Beyond numerical differences, the representation of technologies also differs among models, which needs to be taken into account when comparing numerical parameters. While desirable, it seems difficult to fully harmonize techno-economic parameters across a broader range of models due to structural differences in the representation of technology. Therefore, making techno-economic parameters available in the future, together with of the technology representation as well as the exact definitions of the parameters should become the standard approach as it allows an open discussion of appropriate assumptions. � 2019 The Authors |
URI: | https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.12.131 http://hdl.handle.net/11718/25354 |
ISSN: | 3605442 |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
looking_under_the_2019.pdf | 3.62 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.