Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/26423
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDev, Pritha-
dc.contributor.authorShah, Vidhi-
dc.contributor.authorBoriwal, Vinay-
dc.date.accessioned2023-04-24T04:19:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-04-24T04:19:46Z-
dc.date.issued2022-03-21-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/26423-
dc.description.abstractWhen it comes to suitable negotiation results, men and women frequently disagree. Men demand "equitable" distributions, but women believe in "equal" exchanges (Lewicki et al, 1994). These biases may lead female negotiators to accept equal outcomes while having more negotiating power, whereas men negotiators seek equitable exchanges that reflect relevant power inequalities. Boys and girls go through distinct acculturation processes, which might explain gender-based competitive disparities. Daughters are more likely to be protected by their parents than males. Most males are exposed to competitive settings at a young age, such as sports leagues and other activities. Men are more likely than women to have grown acclimated to the hardships of overt rivalry by maturity.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Ahmedabaden_US
dc.subjectNegotiationsen_US
dc.subjectGender and negotiationsen_US
dc.subjectNegotiation behavioren_US
dc.subjectMotherhood and negotiationsen_US
dc.titleMotherhood and negotiationsen_US
dc.typeStudent Projecten_US
Appears in Collections:Student Projects

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Motherhood_and_Negotiations.pdf
  Restricted Access
388.22 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.