Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/27078
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorArayankalam, Jithesh-
dc.contributor.authorSoral, Prakriti-
dc.contributor.authorKhan, Anupriya-
dc.contributor.authorKrishnan, Satish-
dc.contributor.authorBose, Indranil-
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T06:35:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-05T06:35:28Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-04-
dc.identifier.issn18727530-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/27078-
dc.description.abstractThis study primarily examines how the centralization of online content regulation increases political hate speech in a country. It also explores the roles of the government’s social media surveillance and disinformation in this relationship. Calhoun’s public choice theory is used as a theoretical foundation to examine relationships. Data from 179 nations are analyzed using a mixed-method approach (i.e., path analysis and fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis), and the findings reveal how centralization of online content regulation results in higher levels of political hate speech by increasing social media surveillance of political content and disinformation through social media by the government.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofInformation & Managementen_US
dc.subjectPolitical hate speechen_US
dc.subjectOnline content regulationen_US
dc.subjectDisinformationen_US
dc.subjectSocial mediaen_US
dc.subjectPublic choice theoryen_US
dc.titleDoes centralization of online content regulation affect political hate speech in a country? A public choice perspectiveen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.