Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/27313
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVarshney, Mayank-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-01T05:45:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-01T05:45:45Z-
dc.date.issued2024-02-19-
dc.identifier.issn2059-5794-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/27313-
dc.description.abstractTechnology acquisition is a common phenomenon of acquiring external knowledge, but we have a limited understanding of conditions in which the acquirer integrates the target or not. On one hand, the acquirer may have a policy to integrate the target to benefit from its prior knowledge. On the other hand, the target may face challenges in continuing its knowledge creation and the acquirer may want to provide it autonomy to not disrupt it. This paper aims to identify conditions in which targets tend to be less integrated after acquisitions, allowing them to maintain more autonomy and contribute more to knowledge creation.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherEmerald Publishing Limiteden_US
dc.relation.ispartofCross Cultural & Strategic Managementen_US
dc.subjectPath dependenceen_US
dc.subjectCultural differenceen_US
dc.subjectTechnology acquisitionen_US
dc.subjectDifference-in-differenceen_US
dc.subjectBiopharmaceutical industryen_US
dc.subjectStructural differenceen_US
dc.titleTo integrate or not? Understanding knowledge integration of target firmen_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.