Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/27578
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAntoniou, Margarita
dc.contributor.authorSinha, Ankur
dc.contributor.authorPapa, Gregor
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-26T09:08:48Z
dc.date.available2024-11-26T09:08:48Z
dc.date.issued2024-08-31
dc.identifier.issn2214-7160
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/27578
dc.descriptionIn this paper, we analyze a perturbed formulation of bilevel optimization problems, which we refer to as delta-perturbed formulation. The delta-perturbed formulation allows to handle the lower level optimization problem efficiently when there are multiple lower level optimal solutions. By using an appropriate perturbation strategy for the optimistic or pessimistic formulation, one can ensure that the optimization problem at the lower level contains only a single (approximate) optimal solution for any given decision at the upper level. The optimistic or the pessimistic bilevel optimal solution can then be efficiently searched for by algorithms that rely on solving the lower level optimization problem multiple times during the solution search procedure. The delta-perturbed formulation is arrived at by adding the upper level objective function to the lower level objective function after multiplying the upper level objective by a small positive/negative . We provide a proof that the delta-perturbed formulation is approximately equivalent to the original optimistic or pessimistic formulation and give an error bound for the approximation. We apply this scheme to a class of algorithms that attempts to solve optimistic and pessimistic variants of bilevel optimization problems by repeatedly solving the lower level optimization problem.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we analyze a perturbed formulation of bilevel optimization problems, which we refer to as delta-perturbed formulation. The delta-perturbed formulation allows to handle the lower level optimization problem efficiently when there are multiple lower level optimal solutions. By using an appropriate perturbation strategy for the optimistic or pessimistic formulation, one can ensure that the optimization problem at the lower level contains only a single (approximate) optimal solution for any given decision at the upper level. The optimistic or the pessimistic bilevel optimal solution can then be efficiently searched for by algorithms that rely on solving the lower level optimization problem multiple times during the solution search procedure. The delta-perturbed formulation is arrived at by adding the upper level objective function to the lower level objective function after multiplying the upper level objective by a small positive/negative . We provide a proof that the delta-perturbed formulation is approximately equivalent to the original optimistic or pessimistic formulation and give an error bound for the approximation. We apply this scheme to a class of algorithms that attempts to solve optimistic and pessimistic variants of bilevel optimization problems by repeatedly solving the lower level optimization problem.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.relation.ispartofOperations Research Perspectivesen_US
dc.subjectBilevel optimizationen_US
dc.subjectOptimistic bilevel problemen_US
dc.subjectPessimistic bilevel problemen_US
dc.subjectPerturbation methoden_US
dc.subjectError bounden_US
dc.subjectIterative heuristicsen_US
dc.subjectPopulation-based methodsen_US
dc.subjectEvolutionary Algorithmsen_US
dc.titleDelta-perturbation of bilevel optimization problems: an error bound analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2024.100315en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
a1.pdf1.47 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.