Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/27813
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMaun, Deepak-
dc.contributor.authorChand, Vijaya Sherry-
dc.contributor.authorShukla, Kathan Dushyant-
dc.date.accessioned2025-05-28T06:32:20Z-
dc.date.available2025-05-28T06:32:20Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/27813-
dc.descriptionNon-cognitive outcomes like Academic Self-efficacy (ASE) and Intrinsic Goal Orientation (IGO) have a bearing on students’ academic and life outcomes. Yet, the way teacher practices influence these outcomes has remained underexplored. We examined the influence of Teacher Innovative Behaviour (TIB) on students’ IGO and ASE within a span of one academic year (2015–16) in Indian government primary schools. Using structural equation modelling, we studied change in IGO and ASE among school students (N = 6421, grades 6–8) taught by 346 teachers with varying levels of TIB. The findings revealed that higher levels of TIB predicted higher levels of IGO but were unrelated to ASE after controlling for student demographics and prior outcomes. The independent variables collectively explained 20% and 15% of the variation in IGO and ASE. The implications of this study for teacher educators, education administrators, and policymakers are discussed.en_US
dc.description.abstractNon-cognitive outcomes like Academic Self-efficacy (ASE) and Intrinsic Goal Orientation (IGO) have a bearing on students’ academic and life outcomes. Yet, the way teacher practices influence these outcomes has remained underexplored. We examined the influence of Teacher Innovative Behaviour (TIB) on students’ IGO and ASE within a span of one academic year (2015–16) in Indian government primary schools. Using structural equation modelling, we studied change in IGO and ASE among school students (N = 6421, grades 6–8) taught by 346 teachers with varying levels of TIB. The findings revealed that higher levels of TIB predicted higher levels of IGO but were unrelated to ASE after controlling for student demographics and prior outcomes. The independent variables collectively explained 20% and 15% of the variation in IGO and ASE. The implications of this study for teacher educators, education administrators, and policymakers are discussed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEducational Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectTeacher innovative behaviouren_US
dc.subjectInnovative work behaviouren_US
dc.subjectIntrinsic goal orientationen_US
dc.subjectAcademic self-efficacyen_US
dc.subjectNon-cognitive outcomesen_US
dc.titleInfluence of teacher innovative behaviour on students’ academic self-efficacy and intrinsic goal orientationen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2023.2241682en_US
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.