Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/3552
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Rangarajan, C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Mampilly, Paul | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-01T04:20:41Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-01T04:20:41Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 1971-11-27 | |
dc.date.issued | 1971-11-27T04:20:41Z | |
dc.identifier.citation | Economic and Political Weekly, Vol.7(9), 26 Feb,1972 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/3552 | |
dc.description.abstract | IN 'Net Present Value versus Internal Rate of Return' (November 27, 1971, pp M-153-6), Rangarajan and Mampilly express the view that while both the Net Present Value (NPV) and the Internal Rate of Return techniques have an underlying implicit assumption about re-investment of the cash flows generated during the life-time of a project, the main difference between them lies in assuming different re-investment rates. | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.title | Net present value Vs internal rate of returns | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
net_present_value_versus_internal_rate_of_return.pdf Restricted Access | 366.48 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.