Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/4324
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKrishnan, K. T.
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-23T05:14:46Z
dc.date.available2010-06-23T05:14:46Z
dc.date.copyright1976-04
dc.date.issued1976-04-23T05:14:46Z
dc.identifier.citationIndian Economic Review, 11 (1), (Apr 1976)en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/4324
dc.description.abstractClassical economists advocated free trade because they concentrated on the gains from trade ignoring the effect of international trade on income distribution. Though, it is diagrammatically possible to prove that free trade would take the country as a whole to a higher indifference curve, it was not possible to say un ambiguously whether international trade would lead to an increase in the welfare of all the people, or at least keep a few on the pre-trade level of welfare and Vnove others to a higher level of welfare. Stolper and Samuelson, immediately after the publication of the Heckscher-Ohlin trade model, argued that imposition of tariff would increase the reward of the country's relatively scarce factor. Conversely, any movement towards free trade would increase the reward of the country's relatively abundant factor.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleUnemployment, international trade and factor pricesen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
UnemploymentInternationalTradeandFactorPrices.pdf
  Restricted Access
517.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.