Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/4418
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMurthy, K.R. Srinivasa
dc.contributor.authorMalcolm, Salter S.
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-25T06:10:23Z
dc.date.available2010-06-25T06:10:23Z
dc.date.copyright1975
dc.date.issued1975-06-25T06:10:23Z
dc.identifier.citationHarvard Business Review, 53, (May-June 1975), 66-73en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/4418
dc.description.abstractIn many companies the compensation of top executives fluctuates without regard to the ups and downs of profits, return on equity, or earnings per share. This lack of correlation between pay and financial performances seems to be most noticeable in companies with one dominant business. (In companies pursuing a variety of unrelated businesses, the fluctuations in pay level tend to be greater, but they are tied more closely to changes in profit performance.) A company that lets top executive pay get out of phase with profitability may be asking for trouble, the authors believe. Not only may the practice be damaging to employee morale, but it also opens the door to criticism from union spokesmen,...
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleShould CEO pay be linked to results?en
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ShouldCEO.pdf
  Restricted Access
652.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.