Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/4418
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Murthy, K.R. Srinivasa | |
dc.contributor.author | Malcolm, Salter S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-06-25T06:10:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-06-25T06:10:23Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 1975 | |
dc.date.issued | 1975-06-25T06:10:23Z | |
dc.identifier.citation | Harvard Business Review, 53, (May-June 1975), 66-73 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/4418 | |
dc.description.abstract | In many companies the compensation of top executives fluctuates without regard to the ups and downs of profits, return on equity, or earnings per share. This lack of correlation between pay and financial performances seems to be most noticeable in companies with one dominant business. (In companies pursuing a variety of unrelated businesses, the fluctuations in pay level tend to be greater, but they are tied more closely to changes in profit performance.) A company that lets top executive pay get out of phase with profitability may be asking for trouble, the authors believe. Not only may the practice be damaging to employee morale, but it also opens the door to criticism from union spokesmen,... | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.title | Should CEO pay be linked to results? | en |
dc.type | Article | en |
Appears in Collections: | Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ShouldCEO.pdf Restricted Access | 652.35 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.