Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/4456
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPrahalad, C. K.
dc.date.accessioned2010-06-25T09:59:43Z
dc.date.available2010-06-25T09:59:43Z
dc.date.copyright1976
dc.date.issued1976-06-25T09:59:43Z
dc.identifier.citationHarvard Business Review, 54 (4), (July-Aug 1976), 67-78en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/4456
dc.description.abstractProf. Prahalad analyzes the interrelation of strategic decision-making and a matrix structure of organization using a diversified multinational, the Beta corporation and its Executive Vice President, Dave Austin, as illustrations. Beta had four business aggregates - petrochemicals, pharmaceuticals, consumer products and mining; divided its operations into four areas - North America, Europe, Latin AmericdMiddle East and Asia/Africa/Australia; and had functional groups at the second level of organization - R&D, production, etc. At the top level, the matrix structure required approval of major decisions, such as investments, by both business group and area officials and joint venture partners also had to be considered. At the second level "conflicts took on a different color. For example, the functional groups ... controlled the deployment of almost all the technical manpower." Another area of conflict was over plant size with functional executives favoring larger scale units than area managers.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleStrategic choices in diversified MNCsen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
StrategicChoicesinDiversifiedMNCs.pdf
  Restricted Access
184.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.