Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/524
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lahiri, Somdeb | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2009-12-12T07:09:29Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2009-12-12T07:09:29Z | - |
dc.date.copyright | 1999-04 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009-12-12T07:09:29Z | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/524 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The purpose of this paper is to establish the equivalence of two axioms one of which appear in Nehring [1997] and the other in Nehring and Puppe [1999]. The one in Nehring and Puppe [1999] is due to Aizerman and Malishevski [1981]. We there by improve the existing characterisation of choice functions rationalized by extended partial orders. In appendix to this paper we provide a proof of a related statement appearing in Nehring [1997]. This paper makes extensive use of the rather elegant device known as finite mathematical induction. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | WP;99-04-01/1511 | - |
dc.subject | Choice theory | en |
dc.title | Extended partial orders: a note | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
Appears in Collections: | Working Papers |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
WP 1999_1511.pdf | 347.13 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.