Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/5305
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDholakia, Ravindra H.
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-15T04:28:05Z
dc.date.available2010-07-15T04:28:05Z
dc.date.copyright1996
dc.date.issued1996-07-15T04:28:05Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/5305
dc.descriptionEconomic and Political Weekly, Vol. 32, No. 3, (January 18, 1997)en
dc.description.abstractI AM deeply indebted to Ravindra H Dhotakia for his most perceptive comments 'Maxi Devaluations and Cooper's Hypothesis', EPW, November 23) on my paper 'Cooper's Contractionary Devaluation Hypothesis. A Note', EPW, July 27) on two counts. First, it is always gratifying for an author to have his work read and reacted upon by someone whose views matter. Second, for pointing out the limitations on the use of infinitesimals in analysing finite changes. Most theoretical economists tend to fall into the sometimes reprehensible habit of consideringe-changes from an initial equilibrium, which requires characterisation of the relevant functional forms only in the neighbourhood of the initial equilibrium. This would be unexceptionable if either of two conditions are met: (a) the functions are strictly monotonic in the relevant range; or (b) the changes being contemplated can reasonably be assumed to be relatively small. If neither is met, the results arising from the use of differential calculus in the analysis become suspect.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectMaxi Devaluationen
dc.titleMaxi devaluations and contractionen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
maxi_devaluations_and_contraction.pdf
  Restricted Access
774.89 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.