Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/5306
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDholakia, Ravindra H.
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-15T04:30:58Z
dc.date.available2010-07-15T04:30:58Z
dc.date.copyright1996
dc.date.issued1996-07-15T04:30:58Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/5306
dc.descriptionEconomic and Political Weekly, Vol. 31, Issue No. 47, 23 Nov, 1996en
dc.description.abstractIN a recent paper, Pronab Sen has defended Cooper's contractionary devaluation hypothesis in a very interesting and lucid way ('Cooper's Contractionary Devaluation Hypothesis: A Note', EPW, July 27). In the true spirit of macro modelling, he has effectively demonstrated the validity of Cooper's hypothesis with important modifications through the six propositions derived from a simplified macro model. His most important proposition is his Result 4 which states that gross complementarity of home goods and imports in the domestic consumption is the necessary condition for the devaluation to be contractionary. Since it is a distinct (and maybe most likely) possibility to find gross complementarity between the home goods and imports in the domestic consumption in several developing countries, Sen concludes "that 'maxi' devaluations do not always need to be accompanied by contractionary fiscal and monetary policies". Something more is needed to arrive at this conclusion than what is contained in Sen's note.
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectMaxi Devaluationen
dc.titleMaxi devaluations and cooper s hypothesisen
dc.typeArticleen
Appears in Collections:Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Maxi_devaluations_and_coopers_hypothesis.pdf
  Restricted Access
457.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open Request a copy


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.