Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/6333
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Bhupat M.
dc.contributor.authorNamboodiri, N. V.
dc.date.accessioned2010-07-27T06:13:02Z
dc.date.available2010-07-27T06:13:02Z
dc.date.copyright1991-02
dc.date.issued2010-07-27T06:13:02Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/6333
dc.description.abstractThis paper analyses performance of Farmers' Service Societies (FSS) and Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Societies (PACS) comparatively. Features of these two field-level rural financial institutions (RFIs) are described in Section-II. Section-III conceptualizes performance criteria. Section-IV discusses application of these criteria and analyses the empirical results. Major conclusion of the paper is that FSS have performed better than PACS. But both these RFIs have not succeeded in undertaking agro-marketing and processing. Implications of these findings are discussed in the last section.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWP;1991/920
dc.subjectFarmers serviceen
dc.subjectAgricultural cooperative credit societiesen
dc.titleComparative performance of farmers service societies and primary agricultural cooperative credit societiesen
dc.typeWorking Paperen
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
WP 1991_920.pdf445.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.