Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/6815
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Desai, Bhupat M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Namboodiri, N. V. | |
dc.contributor.author | Patel, S. M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-08-03T03:57:35Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-03T03:57:35Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 1979 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-08-03T03:57:35Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/6815 | |
dc.description.abstract | The case raises several questions about how to prioritize the relative importance of credit and non-credit factors in promoting fertilizer use. It also discusses the relative importance of two types of short-term agricultural credit - direct and indirect. These questions are posed with a view to understanding the contribution of financial institutions in fertilizer use so that appropriate action could be suggested by these agencies to promote fertilizer use. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Banking | en |
dc.subject | Agriculture | en |
dc.title | Relative Roles of Direct and Indirect Rural Credit in Promoting Fertilizer Use | en |
dc.type | Cases and Notes | en |
Appears in Collections: | Cases and Notes |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.