Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/6815
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Bhupat M.
dc.contributor.authorNamboodiri, N. V.
dc.contributor.authorPatel, S. M.
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-03T03:57:35Z
dc.date.available2010-08-03T03:57:35Z
dc.date.copyright1979
dc.date.issued2010-08-03T03:57:35Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/6815
dc.description.abstractThe case raises several questions about how to prioritize the relative importance of credit and non-credit factors in promoting fertilizer use. It also discusses the relative importance of two types of short-term agricultural credit - direct and indirect. These questions are posed with a view to understanding the contribution of financial institutions in fertilizer use so that appropriate action could be suggested by these agencies to promote fertilizer use.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectBankingen
dc.subjectAgricultureen
dc.titleRelative Roles of Direct and Indirect Rural Credit in Promoting Fertilizer Useen
dc.typeCases and Notesen
Appears in Collections:Cases and Notes

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.