Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11718/7654
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDesai, Bhupat M.
dc.contributor.authorNamboodiri, N. V.
dc.date.accessioned2010-08-18T08:47:28Z
dc.date.available2010-08-18T08:47:28Z
dc.date.copyright2000
dc.date.issued2010-08-18T08:47:28Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11718/7654
dc.description.abstractThis case, based on published literature and field visits, poses some questions as to whether SHGs can be a substitute for the existing "mode" or "strategy" of RFIs in reaching the unreached, which of three models of linkage of SHGs with banks may be chosen, in what manner saving and loan portfolios of SHGs differ from that of formal RFIs, and how would one rate the performance of SHGs linkage programme from the viewpoints of various stakeholders. Information and data are provided to analyse these questions in addition to providing some historical background of this concept.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.subjectRural Bankingen
dc.subjectAgricultureen
dc.titleSHGs as a Strategy or Mode for Reaching the Unreached for Rural Crediten
dc.typeCases and Notesen
Appears in Collections:Cases and Notes

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.