Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11718/7858
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Pandey, I. M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-08-24T09:34:13Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-08-24T09:34:13Z | |
dc.date.copyright | 2002 | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-08-24T09:34:13Z | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11718/7858 | |
dc.description.abstract | The thinking of leaders like Nehru, Savarkar and Ambedkar influenced the developing India; Savarkar’s led to the Hindu/Non-Hindu axis, while Ambedkar’s to the Dalit/Non-Dalit Axis, and high income-inequality provided the Rich/Poor axis. These three axes give rise to eight possible groups, which differ widely in their ‘power’ and ‘number shares. State elites, comprising of bureaucrats, external groups and organized interests, Indian and foreign, additionally contribute to the complexity of the situation as the non-axial groups, which are engaged in a continuous tussle that is nowhere near equilibrium. And, this complex situation, is today defining the authority the state can have. The conclusion – from a powerful state, a devolved power structure has to evolve. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.subject | Axes of the Indian Nation | en |
dc.title | Axes of the Indian Nation | en |
dc.type | Cases and Notes | en |
Appears in Collections: | Cases and Notes |
Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in IIMA Institutional Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.